Connect and

As I gear up for another year at the coalface, I’ve been looking at the digital tools I have at my disposal, and the best way to use them.  For the past four or five years, I have had a class website – – where I have tried to keep all lessons, daily work pads, programs, parent correspondence and items of interest to the students in one place.  In recent years, I moved away from online platforms such as Edmodo, and incorporated my own online testing and social media aspects into the website as well, combining these with each student’s school Google account.

With Connect now up and running (and with new features being added regularly), I’m looking to scale back my use of and move things over to the Connect portal, for a number of reasons:

  • students have an email address that they will take with them to high school, or any WA public school for that matter
  • There is no grey area for student data storage – it is being kept and maintained by my employers
  • The in-built assessment and records module looks flexible enough for my needs (although it will be a step backwards form my current arrangements, it makes sense to use what the Department is offering)
  • In my communications with e-Schooling, they outlined their reasons for teachers to not make use of class blogging systems (e.g. data storage concerns, security issues, overseas hosting)

Last year, I used Connect as a trial – in addition to my use of a class website.  I had one SIS class set up, with all subject areas within it.  It became very messy, very quickly.

This year, I will be setting up multiple classes – English, Mathematics, HASS and Other (Science is taught by a specialist in my school, otherwise I would have had a separate one for that too).  I will still be using to host my developed lessons, however (I enjoy having more control over formatting and linking of videos, PowerPoints etc).  My daily work pad and programs are also available for any parent (or student) to view there, and I will be using it as a “home base” for links to any cloud based learning for my students (Quizlet, Khan Academy, Reading Eggspress, etc).

Parent communication remains an unknown at this stage – parent access to Connect can only be unlocked for a whole school, not class by class, so there needs to be a conversation at our school before that can happen.  If it doesn’t, then I’ll have to think about how I want to keep my parents best informed as to their child’s up-to-date progress.

In previous years, I have provided my students with an email account through our school’s Google Apps account, and used the Google Drive function regularly for collaborative documents and chat sessions.  This year, I will expect my students to correspond using their emails that they have access to through Connect, but I will also set up Google accounts using the same username as their Connect account, so we can still access Drive, and students can also still use their Google accounts to log into third-party websites such as Khan Academy and Quizlet.  I will not be utilising the school email system this year, as a result.

Finally, in previous years my students have run electronic portfolios as part of  With the Department frowning upon this practice, I’ve decided to scale this right back this year.  I’ve developed other programs to run which still target the Information and Media Arts aspects of the curriculum to take its place, and I will tinker with some different options for ensuring student reflection and feedback is maximised.

All in all, I’m looking forward to implementing Connect much deeper into my classroom philosophy, despite some compromises having to be made to the workflow I have developed over the past few years.

Bring on 2015!

iPad Posters and Resources

The following documents have helped support the use of iPads at our school:

File Downloads Function
iPad Apps to Support Bloom’s Taxonomy
(JPG – 2.2Mb)

(PSD – 11.7Mb)

An A1-sized poster located in our staffroom. We have icons of all apps found on our iPads sorted into the relevant Bloom’s Taxonomies to assist teachers in choosing an app to meet a learning need.
Apps in Use at Goollelal Posters
(PDF – 27Mb)
Posters which highlight some of the apps on the Goollelal iPads. These were some of the first apps we purchased for our devices.
iPad App Evaluation Purchase Request
(DOCX – <1Mb)
This documents assists teachers in evaluating paid apps to ensure they are able to offer students a powerful technological tool.
Apps Found on the Goollelal iPads
(PDF – 1.2Mb)
This is a regularly-updated list of all apps found on the iPads, offering teachers a quick, easy yet detailed list. It is located alongside our Bloom’s Taxonomy poster.

iPads: Fixed or Flexible Timetables?

I’m going to use a really dodgy analogy to express my point of view today.  I’m a big believer in flexible timetables over fixed timetables in schools with regard to technology.  And here’s my reasoning, outlined in two corresponding stories:

Our school purchased a class set of iPads during the Christmas break.  They were good ones – pretty expensive, and whizz-bang compared to what we had in our classrooms already.

The first thing we had to do was work out how to use the things – they had plenty of apps and “extra features”, so we planned a couple of lessons around the devices.  Our iMovie editing of Halloween pumpkin carving, our Explain Everything multimedia presentations of the benefits of sheep dips and farming practices, and the Book Creator social stories about strawberry allergies were great ways to learn how to use the iPads!

Once we were comfortable with their use, and could see their potential in future learning journeys, we finished our experimentation and went back to planning our lessons based around our students’ needs and wants.  Last week, we studied the process of farming broccoli, and the students created an interactive flowchart using the iPads.  Just yesterday, we watched a video on live cattle transportation, and students practiced their note taking skills.  We didn’t use the iPads.

What we didn’t do was say, “every Tuesday and Thursday afternoons, we have to use the iPads.”

We used the iPads when they were the best tool for the job.


My wife and I bought a new blender during the Christmas break. It was a good one – pretty expensive, and whizz-bang compared to what we had in our kitchen already.

The first thing we had to do was work out how to use the thing – it had lots of buttons and “extra features”, so we planned a couple of meals around the appliance.  Our pumpkin soup, our cashew and parmesan dip and the strawberry smoothies were delicious!

Once we were comfortable with its use, and could see its potential in future meal creations, we finished our experimentation and went back to planning our meals based around our needs and wants.  Last week, we needed to use up the broccoli from the fridge, felt like broccoli soup, so we used the blender.  Just yesterday, we bought some great rib-eye steak, so we used the barbecue to create our culinary feast.  We did not use the blender.

What we didn’t do was say, “every Tuesday and Thursday night, we have to use the blender.”

We used the blender when it was the best tool for the job.






Extending Google Drive for the Classroom

Over the last few years, I’ve experimented with a variety of ways for my students to submit their work online for marking. Most have revolved around the use of Google Docs / Google Drive, but I have dabbled with Schoology, Edmodo and Turn It In. At the end of the day, I’ve always gone back to Google Drive, since I already have emails set up for students.

However, one of the big bugbears with using Google Drive has been the sharing of files aspect. Usually, I share a file, ask my students to make a copy for themselves, edit it, rename it, and share it with me. Students being students, any one of these steps missed stopped the workflow. Forget to make a copy – students edit the master for everyone! Forget to rename it – I have 30 documents all with the same name, causing a nuisance in my drive. Share it with me – there’s nothing like sitting down to an evening of marking and finding three students haven’t shared it, or have only given me view rights. Aaaargghh!While I’m not intending to go “paperless” as such in my classroom, I do want to use Google Drive as much as possible for the submission of work. So I did some digging, and I think I’ve hit some gold!

In short, I’ve found some great Google Drive scripts that seem to do most of the heavy lifting for me. The following descriptions come from the respective websites:

  • gClassFolders – a free, Google-Spreadsheet-based add-on for Google Apps for EDU that creates class folders for students and teachers to simplify and streamline their experience of using Google’s world class productivity and collaboration tools in the classroom.
  • Doctopus –  gives teachers the ability to auto-generate, pre-share, and manage grading and feedback on templated Docs for group and individual projects.  The script allows teachers to harness all the awesomeness, ubiquitous access, and collaborative authoring power made possible by Google Docs without creating a document management nightmare.  It enables improved workflows for sharing and organizing with students, as well as tracking progress and providing feedback.
  • Goobric – allows for rubric-based grading of Google Drive resources (Documents, Presentations, Spreadsheets, Folders, etc.) and –currently– only works with resources created via the Doctopus Script for teachers
  • Kaizena – giving voice feedback is faster with Kaizena than a word processor, and far faster than red pen. Every feature is designed to save you time, because fast feedback is high quality feedback.

So far, I’ve used gClassFolders to set up all my students’ dropboxes, and it worked like a dream.

The following YouTube tutorials and Google Hangout webinar were very useful to me in learning more about these. I’m looking forward to implementing these for my students this year!

Using Visible Learning in my classroom

My journey to become a better teacher has coincided with my discovery of John Hattie’s Visible Learning principles, and I thought I’d record how my introspective reflection has led to my use of effect size, SOLO Taxonomy and visible learning mantra within my classroom.

My journey began four years ago, with a simple student survey of my teaching habits.
Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.03.41 am
The previous year, I’d moved from Fitzroy Crossing DHS to Goollelal – from a remote aboriginal community school, to a “leafy green” metro school – and through an analysis of my repertoire of teaching strategies, geared towards engaging weaker, disengaged indigenous students, I identified that there were aspects of my teaching that needed to change.

I have always encouraged my students to be critical of my teaching habits.  The simple student survey I conducted was a reflective PMI towards the end of 2009.  It suggested I wasn’t providing feedback quickly enough for my students’ liking.  Although we negotiated suitable timeframes and guidelines at the time, I began to research the techniques and methodology that other highly effective teachers use.

I began engaging with colleagues in professional discussions – both within my school and utilising my online Twitter network –  and was given a range of starting points – one of which was the research of John Hattie. After reading John Hattie’s Visible Learning, and more recently, Visible Learning for Teachers books, I began applying some of the key recommendations to my own teaching – such as identifying the importance of self-grading and making explicit learning intentions.

If you are unfamiliar with John Hattie, he is an educational researcher from New Zealand who has spent the last few decades examining as many studies into learning as he can.  Based on his meta-analysis of over 60,000 studies, he has developed a quantifiable list of influential factors on a child’s learning.

When you look at the three main recommendations that come out of his analysis – making learning goals transparent for the student, making the criteria for success explicit, and providing explicit feedback about student progress – you get an idea of why his reasoning for maximising impact on learning has been labelled Visible Learning – it’s all about making the journey for success as visible as possible for the student.

So I integrated the concept of SOLO Taxonomy and its explicit nature of expressing success criteria into my teaching and learning programs, and worked with my students to help them identify what was required for their learning, and what success would look like.
Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.06.51 am
After attending a professional development presented by John Hattie on Visible Learning, I adapted what I had seen of the  New Zealand asTTle student feedback system, to meet my own requirements of my own feedback model for my students, providing them with an overview of gaps in learning and strengths and also providing them with individualised, explicit feedback sheets which they use to identify for themselves areas they need to focus on. The examples here come from pre-testing:Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.09.57 am.

Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.08.37 am


I utilised Hattie’s effect size measurements to measure the effectiveness of my teaching practices across all areas, using the data I gathered to refine my teaching style into one which I believe is highly effective.

Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.13.44 am

If you are unfamiliar with effect sizes, it is a measure of learning growth over a period of time, with the salient message being that if we as teachers are to make a difference with our teaching , we need to set our student learning targets at an effect size of 0.40 or better over the course of one year or a unit of work. This is a fairly simplistic summary of effect sizes – I thoroughly recommend reading Hattie’s Visible Learning for Teachers.  Some light bed-time reading!

Screen Shot 2013-10-27 at 12.16.12 am




Using the SEN Tool

I was fortunate enough to recently take part in a professional development session to use the Students with Educational Needs Tool (SEN Tool – found in the DoEWA Portal under Reporting to Parents), run by the SEN Autism team.

It allows teachers to develop Individual (and Group) Education Plans for their students using standardised objectives – meaning they can be transferred easily from school to school when a student’s Integris data is transferred.  The ease of its use, the professional look of the resulting document, and the ability to use it for reviewing and developing alternate reporting processes for those students for whom the mainstream formal reports are inappropriate makes it an amazing tool… and yet I can find very few cases of it being used in schools!


This week, we rolled it out across our school.  Having added all bar one of my IEPs to the system last term, I demonstrated the ease of adding an IEP to the system for the staff by using my remaining one.  Teachers were then given the opportunity to work together within the library lab setting to add their own IEPs – across the course of the afternoon, our school can now boast to not only having all IEPs up-to-date, but also using clear learning intentions and objectives that should be transferrable across all schools (they are based on Australian Curriculum for literacy and numeracy, and the K-10 Syllabus for Health).

The power of the process comes in the reporting, however.  The ability to go into the Reporting to Parents interface, change the drop down menu from K-10 Curriculum to SEN, and then report on the progress of the IEP for each student is a clear, accountable way for teachers to demonstrate they are catering for all students within their class.

If you are in a Western Australian government school, I recommend you check it out:
Learn more

Just as a side note, working with the kindy and pre-primary teachers, we have come up with a way of also using the SEN Tool to create a formal report that looks similar to the Years 1 to 7 reports, but without fiddling with Word Templates, and also being able to maintain a permanent record – and yet allowing the teachers to report against some of the fine-grain points from the Foundation level curriculum.

Australian Curriculum content elaboration posters

I recently developed these posters, based on the Year 7 Australian Curriculum English, Mathematics, History and Science curricula (version 4.2).  Each set of posters include the relevant outcomes and elaborations.

I created these wall displays so that my students could keep track of what outcomes we had covered during the year, and help develop the essential metalanguage that allows me to have clear discussions with my class when talking about learning intentions and goals-setting. Each set ranges from 4 to 6 A4 pages in length.

Click each image below to download the individual PDFs, or alternatively, click the link to download the 19MB zip file containing all four PDFs.  These were created using Pages (Mac software).  Contact me if you want the Pages versions to edit or use yourself.
Download all as zip file (19Mb)

How to Address the Australian Curriculum in Composite Classes?

With our school moving across to the Australian Curriculum next year in terms of formal reporting, the question arose about how to tackle composite classes and the year-level specific content – mainly in the Science and History areas.

There seems to be little in the way of guidelines from the WA Education Department (and a conversation between our Principal and head office didn’t clear up too much apart from some very general, sweeping statements about “making it work”), so it seems it really is up to individual schools to plan effectively. With the old Schedule A policy, schools were required to formally report on each outcome at least once every two years. This meant a rotation of Science topics over a two-year period – 2010 could have been Earth & Beyond and Energy & Change, and 2011 Life & Living and Natural and Processed Materials. The Australian Curriculum requires all four content areas to be reported on each year – effectively one each term instead of one each semester. The first question asked was, “If we have a Year 4/5 class, do we teach all of the Year 4 and all of the Year 5 content?”

A/B Rotation

Suggestion 1 was to work off an A/B rotation – in even years (i.e. 2012, 2014, 2016 etc), all classes work towards the even year-level content (Yr 2, Yr 4, Yr 6), and in odd years the odd year-level content.  On the face of it, this seems a good solution… until you start digging in and providing scenarios.  There is every likelihood that Jimmy, a Year 2 student in a Year 2/3 class, will learn the Year 3 curriculum on 2013, having learned the Year 1 outcomes on 2012.  In 2014, as Jimmy enters Year 3, and is placed in a Year 3/4 class, he now focusses on the Year 4 content… missing the Year 2 content all together.  End of the world? Maybe not, but certainly not the clean solution that some suggest. Another scenario sees young Alice enter a straight Year 1 class in 2014 and learn the Year 2 content.  In a straight Year 2 class in 2015, she learns to Year 1 content she missed the previous year. Come 2016, Alice is placed into a Year 2/3 class as a Year 3… and learns the Year 2 content she covered in Year 1! All of this A/B concept works perfectly if students remain in the same classes, streamed through primary school.  However, the reality is that composite classes are usually formed out of numerical necessity, and throwing another constraint into class structuring would be a logistical nightmare for administration.

History Key Ideas

Having had discussions at a school level, and reading documentation from other states’ education departments (such as South Australia’s), we decided to take the approach in History of creating composite-class guidelines by focussing on the key ideas of the Historical Knowledge and Understandings. Linking key ideas from (for example) Year 4 and Year 5 allows for a guideline for a Year 4/5 teacher to follow.  History outcomes are still broad enough to allow teachers to choose their own topics and directions to take in delivering content, and the document we have produced will hopefully help us to see the connections that are to be made between year level outcomes. This should ensure that the key concepts are still covered, regardless of whether students are in a straight class or a composite class.  All other skills strands and aspects of the History learning area can still be used as a way of differentiating expectations between different students, and links therefore do not need to be made.

Download a PDF of our draft planning document

Our History document is still in draft form at the moment, and composite statements are yet to be fully discussed and ratified by our staff for 2013, but I feel it is a good start for teachers of our composite classes to begin planning around how to best deliver and cater for both year levels. We’re still discussing Science as a staff – the outcome statements appear to be a little more independent of each other as compared to History, and require more thought.

feature image source: dakardus @ deviantART